Willing to pay a Freemium?
Thursday, August 12, 2010 at 1:38PM Like a lot of businesses, we use Hootsuite to manage several Twitter accounts.
It has a lot of advantages over the Twitter web interface including the ability to pipe RSS feeds to your Twitter stream and allow multiple team members to collaborate in managing the accounts.
However, Hootsuite is now "going Freemium". Basic accounts will still be free, but the enterprise features such as multiple RSS feeds and team members will command a price.
The damage ranges from $4.99 per month for a package which allows multiple RSS feeds up to a truly eye-watering $1,499 per month for the enterprise package which allows you to have more than eight team members and various other goodies.
This has been on the cards for a while (after all Hootsuite were always going to need some kind of revenue stream) and the "Freemium" model is hardly revolutionary any more. Indeed, it seems likely to make increasing inroads into the legal market (see for example the recent Law Society Gazette article on whether the Freemium model could work in legal services).
However, I wonder how small businesses who use Twitter will react? Ning came in for a lot of flack from users when it decided to start charging earlier in the year and a couple of groups of which I am a member decided to relocate as a result. Will the same thing happen with Hootsuite..? after all it is a lot easier to move Twitter clients than to migrate a Ning group.
I have a gut feeling that 'Freemium' seems more attractive when you sign up for it at the start... and less so when it suddenly means paying for something which you have got used to using for free.
On the other hand, Hootsuite have to make money and you could argue that $50 per month is nothing compared to the benefits your business reaps from having access to an enterprise-grade tool to manage your Twitter presence.
What do you think? Are you going to move to a paid Hootsuite account or do you think this will lead to a mass exodus of business users?

